More Hijinx From Squatchmaster

Jeff Patterson is at it again. The Squatchmaster claims to have recorded yet another Bigfoot. I wonder how many he has recorded now, I've lost count.

This particular video is especially bad because he uploaded the video at low resolution (480), probably to hide anything that could be found. Many of his other videos have been uploaded at 1080, so I'm wondering why.

I never realized how bad Jeff's acting is until today. I have only needed to watch three or four of Jeff's videos to figure out how he works. I won't give anything away because he will just change his strategy. I will say this though, he works in a very similar style to Timbergiant Bigfoot.

Squatchmaster immediately tells a few lies or he doesn't understand what he wrote.

The video wasn't "live" to begin with. Jeff says the video is "uncut". Excuse me, I counted at least eight (8) cuts. Since the video had cuts in it, the video is not "unedited". Hoaxmaster also took almost a week to post this video. I have noticed that with a lot of videos, the "evidence" is always found weeks or months later and is then shared.

Here is his latest video, although, I thought he had posted this one earlier. Maybe I have it mixed up with another log throwing video.
 

I kept wondering why Squatchmaster would make eight cuts in an eight minute and change video. I noticed he made about three cuts very close together and it was all in the almost exact location he was standing. I thought there had to be a reason, so I watched the video about another five times and caught what I needed to see after the third time. I wanted to be sure it wasn't the flower tops or grass dancing in the breeze.

Watch the clip below. The first part will be at regular speed, then I'll slow it down a bit.

After I noticed the black, and obviously living creature (guy in a costume), it became clear as to why Jeff made three cuts. My guess is he was giving instructions to his son, or some other person. You can also hear the black thing move from left to right. I thought Bigfoot were supposed to be stealthy beings. This one makes as much noise as Squatchmaster.

There is little chance that Jeff would not see and hear this thing in person.

We have a red flag in his description.

The Squatchmaster states they discovered a sleeping Bigfoot 20 feet away. There was no sleeping Bigfoot because the person in the costume was seen TWICE during recording. This video is just plain terrible in my opinion.

Another huge red flag is the cut while he is recording the alleged beast. The next sequence shows Jeff on the scene of trampled grass and he is acting like something amazing has happened.

 If I had a Bigfoot in frame, I would not stop recording until the thing left, chased me or my battery died. There was absolutely NO excuse to stop recording...unless he needed to cut for a reason, such as his son (or other person) exposed himself.


This may not be proof of a hoax but I think it's fairly good evidence. We have already proven that Squatchmaster has hoaxed twice in the past.

The Squatchmaster: Hoaxing since 2011, Maybe Longer

I have decided to take on busting other hoaxers as time permits and last night, 'The Squsatchmaster' was busted wide open with his video, 'Sasquatch Speech'.

Here is the original video by Jeff Patterson. Don't worry, he can't delete this one from my blog.

This is a recent video of Jeff's in which he claims there is Bigfoot language. We now know this is false because I covered it on last night's blog. Steve Kulls also performed an analysis and came to the same conclusion as I did.

You can read Steve's blog at Squatchdetective

Jeff Patterson posted this particular video on Sept. 5, 2014. There is a lot of echo in the video so we know he has tampered with it. The question is why?

Here is the video after I have reversed Squatchmaster's reversal.

Why am I bringing up this video again?

 Let's take a trip back to Sept. 7, 2011 for the answer. I was looking through Jeff's videos for anything interesting and I wanted something older that shows the Squatchmaster's hoaxing goes back a few years.

I found this little gem hidden way down low in his videos. You need to watch this video first before going to the one below because Jeff Patterson is caught in some lies.

Here is the above video, only I recorded it backwards again. Did you notice anything? There is no reverb in this version. I'll get to that in a moment.

Here are a couple of screen shots to show this video dates back to 2011, and here is a link: STRANGE DISCOVERIES

In this original video, Jeff says this was an EVP session his son conducted and Jeff also said he played the recording BACKWARDS. Now, if he did that, he would know that the recording contained living human speech. The Squsatchmaster deliberately duped people with this audio. He knowingly hoaxed and he can not deny this.


We already know that Jeff hoaxed his recent 'Sasquatch Speech' video but he also had the nerve to lie to someone who questioned him.

"This was part of an EVP session years ago along the lake near one of the old farms that is now under water.
This particular audio clip was from a 4 minute file that has gotten lost over the years."

Really? It got lost? Perhaps Jeff can explain how I found it so easily. Squatchmaster flat out lied to the person he was replying to in the comments of his 'Sasquatch Speech' video.

Jeff Patterson committed a hoax in 2011 and recycled it for another hoax in 2014. The man is a complete fraud and he should not be trusted. All of his videos are worthless now (as if they weren't before).

I highly doubt these are isolated incidences, folks. The day of reckoning for all of these hoaxers has arrived.

The Squatchmaster is Busted

I have long suspected Jeff Patterson, AKA, The Squatchmaster of hoaxing his alleged evidence but hard proof was hard to come by.

 Those of you who are familiar with Jeff may have seen his infamous "tree shaker" video that was featured on 'Finding Bigfoot'. That video did not fair well on the program and Jeff was extremely bitter over the situation.

  Jeff also had a video where he tried to pass off photos of a Gorilla as a Bigfoot. As usual, when jeff gets caught in something, he is quick to remove the videos.

It's not going to happen this time. Before I get to the video, here are a couple of reminders that Squatchmaster doesn't think Bigfoot exists.

If you have not seen Jeff's video of "Sasquatch Speech". Listen to this, it's worse than Sasquatch Ontario's audio.

Just in case Squatchmaster decides to delete his videos, I took the liberty of grabbing a couple of screen shots.

Here is a couple of more screen shots, just in case Jeff tries to back pedal. At least a few people are calling him out on his bullshit lies.

I would like to give credit where credit is due. Sam Kitchen suggests the audio is of human speech played backwards. I decided to put his assertions to the test.

Well, did you hear that, folks? Clear spoken English! I have no idea where Jeff originally got the audio but it's not really important. The important thing is that the Squatchmaster intentionally altered an audio recording and passed it off as Bigfoot language.

The man is a fraud. It has now been proven that Jeff Patterson is a hoaxer. There is no doubt. No wiggle room this time Jeff. It's time for you to have a garage sale and sell your equipment. Find a new hobby.

Patterson also has one or two paranormal YouTube channels, so we might as well dismiss all of those videos too.

Squatchdetective- Todd Standing’s Blinking Bigfoot

Todd Standing resurfaced recently and many people are not happy he has hooked up with Les Stroud and Dr. Jeff Meldrum.

   Steve Kulls of Squatchdetective had some things to say about "Blinky", the Bigfoot that Standing allegedly captured on camera.

"My first reaction to the film was, wow interesting, but a trained eye can see the multiple points of focus such as the camera being focused on the very near plant matter, and for some reason appears to be focused down range particularly on the alleged Sasquatch’s face.
In doing some analysis on the still of the video here is what I found:"

You can read the rest of Steve's analyses here: Blinking Bigfoot

When I studied this Bigfoot photo I thought it looked similar to Todd so I created a crude gif to see what, if any facial features matched up.

 

 

Tim Fasano Invited To Vegas

Well, Mr. Fasano has been invited to Las Vegas by Rick Dyer. Tim explains nothing in the video below but, he does plug his new membership drive. Let's hope this one stays up past the 24 hour mark.

This is what Tim had to say in the description:

The above has been confirmed by Lynk Paul, on Freezer Boy's blog. Mr. Lynk can be a condescending ass most of the time, and this time is no different.
Lynk points out the fact Tim Fasano spelled Derek's name wrong. Gee, that's a nice thing to do to a person who has been invited by the cult....I mean group Lynk is in.

I hate to break this to Lynk Paul but, it's spelled Derek Randles. If a person is going to mention the name of one of the most respected Bigfoot researchers in the community, please have the courtesy to spell his name correctly.

So, Tim has been invited to Las Vegas for the big hoax...I mean Hank reveal. Will Tim get a chance to witness this shin-dig, or will he be left standing in the airport lobby?

 It's a well known fact Tim and Dyer don't get along but for some strange reason, these two people still interact with each other. It's an odd relationship to say the least.
  IF Tim Fasano really gets to record the event and post the unedited video, what will be shown, if anything?

Timbergiantbigfoot Makes Threats

It looks like Timbergiantbigfoot is less than happy about people downloading, enhancing, or analyzing his video, Sasquatch - The Giant Revealed.
  I think the issue I had with this video were the cuts while the subject was being recorded. Many people voiced concerns over this apparent lapse in judgment and the consensus was that editing the video was a really bad idea.
  If anyone had the extreme luck that TGBF does with finding Sasquatch, we would all record until the batteries went dead and we certainly would not edit the video. Save the fancy cuts and music for entertainment videos.
  I messaged Jim asking if I could enhance a portion of his video but I was not graced with a reply. I can only guess he ignored my message. I went ahead and provided a slow motion enhancement with a slight colour change in order to show the subject more clearly.
  If you have not seen the video, I'll put it down below.

The above video has been on my channel for almost two weeks and I still have not heard from Timbergiant. He hasn't sent a message asking me to remove the video and I have not received a copyright infringement notice from YouTube.
  Jim did not mention any names but I think he's the most upset with Tim Fasano over allegations made about Timbergiant`s Sasquatch video. While I don`t necessarily agree with Mr. Fasano`s assessment about Wildlife sanctuaries and costumes, I do agree with his conclusion that this is likely a hoax. At the very least, Jim mislead people or he misidentified the subject in the video.
  There are those who think the furry critter is a bear, and that`s a possibility. TGBF has a previous video in which he believes he found a bear print. The Footprint Says It Best
  I personally think it`s a known animal and I also think people were purposely lead to believe a real Bigfoot was filmed. We don`t see a clear shot of the face, eyes, hands, or any other distinguishing features of this alleged Sasquatch.
  It saddens me to know there are so many people in Bigfootland who blindly accept alleged evidence as facts. When did it become an offense to question the findings of researchers? When did a good portion of the community decide to stop asking questions?
  I'm sorry to burst anyone's bubble, but not every bent tree, fallen tree, furry animal or structure is made by a Bigfoot. You know what? It's okay to question absolutely everything but that's just my opinion.

  Now that you're up to speed, I would like to talk about Timbergiant's latest video. In his monologue, Jim talks about trademarks and copyrights. TGBF is correct about copyright laws but he is wrong about people not being able to use portions of his videos for satire, parody and/or educational purposes.
Here is a link to his rant: Timbergiantbigfoot Adressing The "Situation"

                                 Video is the copyright of the copyright holder(s).
                                 Used for discussion purposes only.


Fair Use Law - U.S.

"One of the rights accorded to the owner of copyright is the right to reproduce or to authorize others to reproduce the work in copies or phonorecords. This right is subject to certain limitations found in sections 107 through 118 of the copyright law (title 17, U. S. Code). One of the more important limitations is the doctrine of “fair use.” The doctrine of fair use has developed through a substantial number of court decisions over the years and has been codified in section 107 of the copyright law.
Section 107 contains a list of the various purposes for which the reproduction of a particular work may be considered fair, such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Section 107 also sets out four factors to be considered in determining whether or not a particular use is fair."

You can read more on Fair Use here.

Because Jim's videos are hosted by a company based in the United States, U.S. law would apply.

UPDATE: Thanks to Steven Streufert for pointing this out to me. This is part of the Terms of Service listed on YouTube: 
"You also hereby grant each user of the Service a non-exclusive license to access your Content through the Service, and to use, reproduce, distribute, display and perform such Content as permitted through the functionality of the Service and under these Terms of Service. The above licenses granted by you in video Content you submit to the Service terminate within a commercially reasonable time after you remove or delete your videos from the Service."
Terms of Service

I was curious, so I decided to check the Canadian Trademark and Copyright database. My search came back with zero results. Either I'm using the wrong search terms, or TGBF has not registered his logo and name.

I was also curious what the costs would be for a copyright and trademark. Timbergiant must have a great budget for his YouTube channel.

The total cost is almost $500 in Canadian funds, plus tax for the Basic package. That's a lot of money to spend on a YouTube channel and I would certainly have to justify the cost if I was do this myself.
  This is the Bigfoot world folks. If people do not want their videos, photos or other evidence to be scrutinized, then perhaps this is the wrong field for some people.
Good, honest researchers for the most part, embrace criticism and questioning.
I wonder why Timbergiant seems so agitated that his video is under the microscope. He was okay with Rex Dutton breaking down his videos but, the outcome was always positive.
I question everything and I encourage you to do the same.